I published an article in the pyatniku ' clouds: bright prospects or bubbles (. http://www. pcweek. ru / its / article / detail. php? ID = 130064. And then there's a little extra to the no - comments. http://cloudclub-ru. blogspot. com/2011/04/blog-post. html. ).
In response to her comments I received a link to another article on the topic:.
http://venture-biz. ru/informatsionnye-tekhnologii/127-oblachnye-servisy.
The article, as I understand it, is a ' antioblachny ' character, but is well written and understandable language. In my opinion it is well represented by many of the misconceptions (though there are quite sensible reasons ) on the Clouds.
The question here is how: should I try to write ' analysis ' of this article, well, like ' exposure bias '?.
Or is the issue no longer relevant?.
Honestly, I was in this (not mine) are still very confused by the publication of its strange design - neither the author nor the date of publication. Some kind of an anonymous.
No comments:
Post a Comment